<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Email Advertising News &#187; Neville Hobson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.emailadvertisingnews.com/author/neville-hobson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.emailadvertisingnews.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 13:35:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Understanding Email Advertising Relevancy</title>
		<link>http://www.emailadvertisingnews.com/2009/11/23/understanding-email-advertising-relevancy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.emailadvertisingnews.com/2009/11/23/understanding-email-advertising-relevancy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neville Hobson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emailadvertisingnews.com/?p=68</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few weeks ago, I wrote about the problem with PR email, the results of a survey on people’s attitudes to the email that PR agencies and others send them. The survey paints a dismal picture of how email is used in the PR business. Now, here comes an equally bleak picture on what marketers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few weeks ago, I wrote about <a href="http://www.nevillehobson.com/2009/11/08/the-problem-with-pr-email/">the problem with PR email</a>, the results of a survey on people’s attitudes to the email that PR agencies and others send them.</p>
<p>The survey paints a dismal picture of how email is used in the PR business.</p>
<p><span id="more-68"></span></p>
<p>Now, here comes an equally bleak picture on what marketers do with email about their brands according to <a href="http://www.sfwlondon.com/news/2009/31">e-Orchard</a>, a survey by London creative agency <a href="http://www.sfwlondon.com/">Stephens Francis Whitson</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.brandrepublic.com/News/968142/Leading-brands-destroying-customer-relationships-online/">Brand Republic reports</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>[…] The report claims to have uncovered evidence of brand owners bombarding customers with irrelevant, mistimed and inappropriate emails.</p>
<p>It splits the brands into ’saints’ and ’sinners’, with the likes of Mini, BA and Ocado showing how it should be done.</p>
<p>While economic pressures are driving more brands online, many of the companies in the survey &#8220;are sending out blanket email campaigns simply because it is cheap to do so,&#8221; the report claims.</p>
<p>The e-Orchard survey covers companies operating across a range of sectors such as retail, financial services, FMCG, travel, entertainment and leisure and argues that some brands surveyed showed:</p>
<ul>
<li>Scant evidence of differentiated communications depending on customer knowledge, behaviour or value</li>
<li>Poor co-ordination of on and offline communications</li>
<li>Dangerously high frequency of highly repetitive, hard sell messages</li>
<li>Brands stuck on transmit: little attempt to engage in any genuine dialogue with customers</li>
<li>Rare examples of genuinely clever, creative, smart brand and commercial thinking</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p>This looks like a worse picture than that suggested by the PR email survey.</p>
<p>Small comfort for anyone.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nevillehobson.com/2009/11/20/marketers-destroy-customer-relationships-online/">Comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.emailadvertisingnews.com/2009/11/23/understanding-email-advertising-relevancy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

